10-02-2010, 12:16 PM
The problem here is that you don't have an actual situation, so this is getting wider and wider.
If both parents are there in your office with the child, and they have joint custody, and they are disagreeing on a certain treatment which you decided their child needs (let's say an antibiotic prescription), I would go ahead and explain to them the importance of that treatment one more time. If they still can't decide, you cannot force them. However, you let them know what the consequences to their decision will be.
They can step outside your office and talk among themselves and then let you know.
They can even call you the next day and let you know.
But there is no grounds for reporting here, unless this situation happens repeatedly, and you see that it is affecting the child's health or endangering the child's life.
In the end, you can only extend the treatment to their child, but you can't impost it, unless it is an emergency.
Does that make sense?
If both parents are there in your office with the child, and they have joint custody, and they are disagreeing on a certain treatment which you decided their child needs (let's say an antibiotic prescription), I would go ahead and explain to them the importance of that treatment one more time. If they still can't decide, you cannot force them. However, you let them know what the consequences to their decision will be.
They can step outside your office and talk among themselves and then let you know.
They can even call you the next day and let you know.
But there is no grounds for reporting here, unless this situation happens repeatedly, and you see that it is affecting the child's health or endangering the child's life.
In the end, you can only extend the treatment to their child, but you can't impost it, unless it is an emergency.
Does that make sense?