rei - You probably don't want me to be treating you. It's usually not a good sign, because I want to be a pathologist. LOL (Okay, seriously, as of now I'm quite interested in pathology, but this might change again in the future.)
medc - Sorry, I don't have the pdf file. I actually bought the book. Oh, actually I forgot to mention, I used the 1999 edition. I heard the new edition contains too much detail.
okt3 - I actually come to this forum on a regular basis to read about people's success stories, and I have read many of your interesting posts in the past, and for those I thank you. I just tend to refrain from spending too much time on the forum, because there are many more important things to do in real life, if you know what I mean.
I have been a regular SDN member for a long time, under the same name Pollux as well, but similarly I haven't made many posts.
asklepios - I didn't use RR pathology because I didn't like it as much as BRS. (I used his lecture notes instead.) I did look at the pathology pictures in the book though, because they were quite high-yield. I also completed the questions at the end of the book and thought they were really good.
golyan - I totally agree with you.
geoemerald - Thank you.
apex - What worked for me might not work for everyone, but I believe there are a important points that people might benefit from, most of them you have probably heard about, but I'll just confirm them with my own experience.
1. Only use FA and HY after you have a basic understanding of the material. In other words, use them as review books, not primary resources for learning new information.
2. Start doing UW questions early. Annotate in FA.
3. In the last few days before exam, make sure you go over NBME questions one more time, or at least the questions you answered incorrectly on. Many will show up on the real exam. Only focus on reviewing FA and doing questions during this time. Don't try to learn anything new; it's not going to work.